Editor: Janine Hansen
Vol. 34 No. 10
America: From Freedom to Fascism!
“America: From Freedom to Fascism” is the most riveting and critical political film I have ever watched in all my years of activism. In November, Nevada Families/Eagle Forum will be sending a DVD of this incredible film with our Newsletter to our supporters.
“America: From Freedom to Fascism” is a startling examination of government. It exposes the systematic erosion of civil liberties in America since 1913 when the Federal Reserve system was fraudulently created. Through interviews with U.S. Congressmen, a former IRS Commissioner, former IRS and FBI agents and tax attorneys and authors, producer Aaron Russo connects the dots between money creation, federal income tax, and the national identity card (REAL ID), which becomes law in May 2008. This ID card will use Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) chips, which are essentially homing devices used to track people. This film shows in great detail and undeniable facts that America is moving headlong into a fascist police state.
The film was produced by Aaron Russo, acclaimed film producer and former candidate for Governor of Nevada, before his recent untimely death to cancer. The DVD is available from the www.freedomtofascism.com However, Nevada Families/Eagle Forum, has purchased bulk copies in order to provide them to you in next month’s Newsletter. We will also have bulk copies available for your personal distribution or Christmas gifts at $5.00 each.
We are dedicated to bringing you the most important information available about preserving life, liberty and family. We lost our largest monthly donor a few months ago due changes in his business. Your continued support is essential! Thank you, Janine Hansen
* * *
Nevada Families/ Eagle Forum will not be selling See’s Candy this year. In addition, we will not be selling Freedom Calendars. The logistics of these projects have become too difficult. We have instead determined to pursue increased educational projects like “America: From Freedom to Fascism” and the one we sent previously “A More Perfect Union.” We depend on your financial support in order to help us continue our educational efforts! Thank you for your support in the past.
* * *
Please read the enclosed brochure entitled “Why We Need the We the People Act (H.R.300)”. This act is the answer to abusive Judicial Activism by the Federal Courts. On the back of the brochure it tells you how to take action. Please Contact Nevada’s Congressmen: Dean Heller, Shelley Berkley, and Jon Porter at the capitol Switchboard (202) 225-3121 and ask them to oppose judicial activism.
* * *
Nevada Families Eagle Forum Newsletter is published 12 times a year. The Subscription price is $25.00.
Are They Planning to Replace the U.S. Dollar with the Amero?
Some Excerpts from Jerome Corsi’s new book “The Late Great USA and from his column “Ex-Mexican prez: ‘Amero” on the Way” on www.worldnetdaily.com
“On the day the North American Monetary Union is created—perhaps on January 1, 2010—Canada, the United States, and Mexico will replace their national currencies with the Amero” Herbert G. Grubel, “the Case for the Amero,”1999. Late Great USA
On October 8, on the Larry King Live Show, “Former Mexican President Vicente Fox confirmed the existence of a plan conceived with President Bush to create a new regional currency in the Americas…It possibly was the first time a leader of Mexico, Canada or the U.S. openly confirmed a plan for a regional currency. Fox explained the current regional trade agreement that encompasses the Western Hemisphere is intended to evolve into other previously hidden aspects of integration.” Jerome Corsi on World Net Daily.
“Put simply, the economic reality today is that the U.S. dollar is losing value and will most likely continue losing value. Whether a dollar collapse occurs depends upon the Federal Reserve and the Treasury’s ability to engineer a gradual decline. But some sort of decline in value of the dollar is almost inevitable.” Late Great USA
Editor’s note: Perhaps you have noticed the increase in the price of gasoline and food. This is a very clear sign that the value of the dollar (what the dollar can actually purchase) is in serious decline.
“The introduction of the amero would entail the same loss of sovereignty that the introduction of the euro has caused in Europe…A move to the amero as a unitary North American currency (to replace the U.S. & Canadian dollars and the Mexican Peso) would entail a …move to a North American Central Bank, which would have…supremacy over the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve. Loss of sovereignty over our own currency would clearly indicate that the United States had surrendered financial sovereignty.”
“While the immediate reaction of most Americans would be that the idea is preposterous, as we learned in 9/11, unanticipated crises can cause otherwise unimaginable changes in national policy. A severe financial crisis, such as the impeding devaluation of the dollar, could serve as a catalyst to make the amero a more acceptable idea. If the alternative were to continue with a dramatically declining dollar or to move to a new currency that would compete strongly in world markets, Americans may be surprisingly ready to accept the amero.”
“Globalists typically argue for regional currencies over national currencies, because they see multinational corporations as our future…The North American agenda is being advanced by international elite who prefer to meet behind closed doors, out of the view of the reporting press.”
“The Council on Foreign Relations has supported regional and global currencies designed to replace nationally issued currencies. In an article in the May/June issue of Foreign Affairs, entitled The End of National Currency, ’CFR economist Benn Steil asserts the dollar is a temporary currency. Steil concluded ‘countries should abandon monetary nationalism,’ moving to adopt regional currencies, on the road to a global ‘one world currency;’”
“…Steve Previs, a vice president of Jeffries International Ltd. In London, said the amero ‘is the proposed new currency for the North American Community which is being developed right now between Canada, the U.S. and Mexico. “ End
The North American Union is moving forward outside the U.S. Congress and outside the knowledge of the American people. We encourage you to find out more about a the NAU by visiting World Net Daily and reading Jerome Corsi’s columns and book, The Late Great USA. In addition, there are many articles by Phyllis Schlafly about the North American Union on www.eagleforum.org
Scholars Explain Bush's SPP (North American Union)
by Phyllis Schlafly, October 10, 2007
Those who seek to understand what's behind the chatter about Bush's Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) as a possible prelude to a North American Union (NAU), similar to the European Union (EU), should read the 35-page White Paper published recently by the prestigious Hudson Institute called "Negotiating North America: The Security and Prosperity Partnership." This Washington, DC think tank is blunt and detailed in describing where SPP is heading.
Here's how Hudson defines SPP's goal: "The SPP process is the vehicle for the discussion of future arrangements for economic integration to create a single market for goods and services in North America." The key words are "economic integration" (a phrase used again and again) into a North American "single market" (another phrase used repeatedly).
"Integration" with Mexico and Canada is exactly what North American Union means, but there's a big problem with this goal. "We the people" of the United States were never asked if we want to be "integrated" with Mexico and Canada, two countries of enormously different laws, culture, concept of government's role, economic system, and standard of living.
Here's how Hudson explains SPP's process: "The most important feature of the SPP design is that it is neither intended to produce a treaty nor an executive agreement like the NAFTA that would require congressional ratification or the passage of implementing legislation in the United States. The SPP was designed to function within existing administrative authority of the executive branch."
Hudson explains further: "The design of the SPP is innovative, eschewing the more traditional diplomatic and trade negotiation models in favor of talks among civil service professionals and subject matter experts with each government. This design places the negotiation fully within the authority of the executive branch in the United States."
Indeed, SPP is very "innovative." The arrogance of SPP's "design" to give the executive branch full "authority" to "enforce and execute" whatever is decided by a three-nation agreement of "civil service professionals," as though it were "law," is exceeded only by its unconstitutionality.
The Hudson White Paper admits the problem that SPP completely lacks "transparency and accountability." Hudson freely admits "the exclusion of Congress from the process"; constituents who contact their Congressmen discover that Members know practically nothing about SPP.
Hudson states that, under SPP, one of the U.S. challenges is "managing Congress." Is Congress now to be "managed," either by executive-branch "authority" or by "dozens of regulators, rule makers, and officials working with their counterparts" from Mexico and Canada?
The Hudson White Paper reminds us that the 2005 Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) document called "Building a North American Community" bragged that its recommendations are "explicitly linked" to SPP. The CFR document called for establishing a "common perimeter" around North America by 2010.
Hudson praises the CFR document for "raising public expectations" about what SPP can accomplish. Hudson explains that, while immigration is not an explicit SPP agenda item, "mobility across the border is central to the idea of an integrated North American economic space."
"Harmonization" with other countries is another frequently used word. One of SPP's Signature Initiatives is "Liberalizing Rules of Origin."
The Hudson Paper reveals SPP's cozy collaboration with "some interest groups and not others." Translated, that means collaboration with multinational corporations, but not with small business or citizen groups.
After the heads of state of the United States, Mexico and Canada met in Waco in March 2005 and announced the creation of SPP by press release, the North American Competitiveness Council emerged as "a private sector forum for business input" to SPP working groups. But, according to Hudson, it wasn't merely "private" because it was "given official sanction."
After the three amigos met in Cancun in 2006, Bush provided taxpayer funding for a think tank called the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) to meet secretly and produce a report called "The Future of North America." That document's favorite catchword is "North American labor mobility," which is a euphemism for admitting unlimited cheap labor from Mexico.
The Hudson White Paper states that "SPP combines an agenda with a political commitment." That's exactly why those who want to protect American sovereignty don't like SPP.
Among the people who take SPP seriously are Rep. Virgil Goode (R-VA) who introduced H.Con.Res. 40 opposing a North American Union and a NAFTA Superhighway, similar resolutions introduced into the state legislatures of 14 states, and Rep. Duncan Hunter's (R-CA) amendment to prohibit the use of federal funds for SPP working groups, which passed the House by the remarkable bipartisan vote of 362 to 63 on July 24, 2007.
The Hudson White Paper suggests that it might be "necessary" for SPP to change its name and acronym. It is unlikely that a change of name will silence the American people who are outraged by the SPP's goals and process.
For more information go to: www.eagleforum.org
August 2, 2007
Madame Speaker, America faces a crisis in health care. Health care costs continue to rise, leaving many Americans unable to afford health insurance, while those with health care coverage, and their physicians, struggle under the control of managed-care "gatekeepers." Obviously, fundamental health care reform should be one of Congress' top priorities.
Unfortunately, most health care "reform" proposals either make marginal changes or exacerbate the problem. This is because they fail to address the root of the problem with health care, which is that government polices encourage excessive reliance on third-party payers. The excessive reliance on third-party payers removes all incentive from individual patients to concern themselves with health care costs. Laws and policies promoting Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) resulted from a desperate attempt to control spiraling costs. However, instead of promoting an efficient health care system, HMOs further took control over health care away from the individual patient and physician.
Furthermore, the predominance of third-party payers means there is effectively no market for individual health insurance polices, thus those whose employers cannot offer them health benefits must either pay exorbitant fees for health insurance or do without health insurance. Since most health care providers cater to those with health insurance, it is very difficult for the uninsured to find health care that meets their needs at an affordable price. The result is many of the uninsured turn to government-funded health care systems, or use their local emergency room as their primary care physician. The result of this is declining health for the uninsured and increased burden on taxpayer-financed health care system.
Returning control over health care to the individual is the key to true health care reform.
The Comprehensive Health Care Reform Act puts control of health care back into the hands of the individual through tax credits, tax deductions, Health Care Savings Accounts (HSA), and Flexible Savings Accounts. By giving individuals tax incentives to purchase their own health care, the Comprehensive Health Care Act will help more Americans obtain quality health insurance and health care. Specifically, the Comprehensive Health Care Act:
A. Provides all Americans with a tax credit for 100% of health care expenses. The tax credit is fully refundable against both income and payroll taxes.
B. Allows individuals to roll over unused amounts in cafeteria plans and Flexible Savings Accounts (FSA).
C. Makes every American eligible for an Health Savings Account (HSA), removes the requirement that individuals must obtain a high-deductible insurance policy to open an HSA; allows individuals to use their HSA to make premiums payments for high-deductible policy; and allows senior citizens to use their HSA to purchase Medigap policies.
D. Repeals the 7.5% threshold for the deduction of medical expenses, thus making all medical expenses tax deductible.
By providing a wide range of options, this bill allows individual Americans to choose the method of financing health care that best suits their individual needs. Increasing frustration with the current health care system is leading more and more Americans to embrace this approach to health care reform. For example, a poll by the respected Zogby firm showed that over 80% of Americans support providing all Americans with access to a Health Savings Account. I hope all my colleagues will join this effort to put individuals back in control of health care by cosponsoring the Comprehensive Health Care Reform Act.
___Yes, I will contribute at this time ___$10 ___$25 ___$50 ___$100 ___$500 ___$1000 other $_____
___Yes, I will contribute monthly ___$10 ___$25 ___$50 ___$100 ___$500 ___$1000 other $_____
Name_________________________________Address_________________________________
City_________________________State_________________Zip_________________________
Phone__________________Fax__________________E-mail____________________________
For E-mail Alerts and Updates.
Please make checks payable to Nevada Eagle Forum, not tax deductible, or Nevada Families (Division of WPA), tax deductible, 186 Ryndon Unit 12, Elko, NV 89801, 775-397-6859, Fax 775-753-9118 director@nevadafamilies.org